Good God elephant! Don’t encourage him!!
His folks would probably consider it an honor.
A sex pervert and Pedophile for "Con"gress…Today’s Republican Party in a nutshell!
Conyers resigned, Franken has demanded an investigation (which the Republicans don’t seem to want, after all, it might clear him), where is the Republican response with Moore?
This is funny, but there is no one from the RNC who is concerned about him dating children. The Republicans have decided power is more important than principle with Trump, Moore is just further down the slippery slope.
Really? A child molester is how you are going to make America great?
I sense desperation in all the liberal attacks on Roy Moore. Only is lefty-land is it "guilty until we prove (or want you to be) you innocent. These politically-motivated hit jobs are obvious for what they are – unless you don’t want to see them. As I’ve said before, haters gonna hate, and that is exactly what this is.
@shoppersmiths: No matter what your “good book” says, I have found from personal experience that the Guilty until proven innocent" modus operandi to be almost exclusively in the right-wing’s side of the court. While it is true that Roy Moore must be considered innocent until proven guilty, there is Moore than enough evidence of past wrongdoing that he should not have a Seat anywhere in congress except maybe in the visitor’s section.
Shopper, you need to recalibrate your sensors.
@Mr_Sherman: What evidence Mr. Sherman? Far as I can tell this is still a she said-he said issue. Plus, unlike almost all other allegations against congress critters, Hollywood elitists and other celebrities, there are credible witnesses coming forward to refute the claims against Moore. As far as I am concerned this is just a well worn Democrat strategy, coming out with dirt on an opponent days or weeks before an election. Seen this so many times and I for one am unwilling to fall for these underhanded tactics anymore. Unless there is well established and credible evidence, I consider Moore to be innocent of all charges against him.
GATO “there are credible witnesses coming forward to refute the claims against Moore.”
Is Shopper the new J Sullivan?
SFCGaTor is quite right; we don’t know what to believe because, at present, the issue is simply a he said-she said-she said-she said-she said-she said situation.
Even without the kid thing, remember Moore was fired from the bench, TWiCE, because of his contempt for the Constitution of the United States of America. He cannot take the oath of office for Senate, without perjuring himself.
@FFreak: Credible witnesses refuting Moore’s accusers – Rhonda Ledbetter, Johnny Belyeu Sr. a former sheriff’s deputy, mall manager Barnes Boyle and Renee Schivera.
Grand Old Pedophiles, and their acolytes, a new Republican standard of excellence.
Isn’t dating married women against one of those 10 Commandments?
Alabama Republican Senate candidate Roy Moore’s account of when he began dating his wife Kayla would place the start of their courtship before her divorce from her first husband, according to court documents.
This comes as the Moore campaign’s defense of the retired judge against multiple allegations of sexual misconduct hinges on disputing minute details of the accusers’ versions of events.
On Tuesday afternoon, the Washington Examiner asked Moore’s campaign to explain apparent contradictions between his account of his relationship with Kayla Kisor and information contained in public records.
SFCGATOR, here is the story from many more people in Alabama
I’ll stand by my original comment Nance, I’m tired of these last minute tactics by Democrats. It’s their own fault for crying wolf so often just before the polls open and I am just not buying it barring any hard evidence. Blame Dan Rather with his forged documents regarding Bush’s election and all the other similar tactics. Same thing going on here with obvious fake evidence of the yearbook which they won’t release for analysis and the card that just happened to surface after thirty years.
sfcgator…you just keep standing by you comment but nance’s link was spot on…by the way, have you ever heard of george wallace?….even he knew when to admit he was wrong…http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-rv/politics/daily/sept98/wallace031795.htm…maybe you can still learn.
SFcgATOR, That’s your proof, eyewitnesses that did not see anything. Ludicrous.