Arlo and Janis by Jimmy Johnson for October 21, 2021

  1. Img 1505
    mywifeslover  over 2 years ago

    This is probably the most “current event” I’ve seen in an A&J strip. Arlo has been famous for his concern over our country’s economic viability if we do not have a wild spending spree for Christmas…

     •  Reply
  2. 1946 dawn
    Thechildinme  over 2 years ago

    I can only hope this experience will eat away at the perceived profits of the companies who took that route, enough to cause them to rethink the benefits of American workers manufacturing American made goods in America, with only 3,000 road miles from origin to destination. Sigh!

     •  Reply
  3. Beaker
    Bullet Bronson Premium Member over 2 years ago

    Who could have imagined something might go wrong? Um, anybody with half a brain?

     •  Reply
  4. Beaker
    Bullet Bronson Premium Member over 2 years ago

    Looks like somebody’s Christmas just fell off the ship.

     •  Reply
  5. Scan0098  2
    charliefarmrhere  over 2 years ago

    The truth finally hits home. The Chinese don’t need their military to defeat us, they already own us from the inside & out.

     •  Reply
  6. 2006 afl collingwood
    nosirrom  over 2 years ago

    The way things are going in the labor market I think we would have supply line issues even if it was manufactured here.

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    John Smith  over 2 years ago

    Greed never learns

     •  Reply
  8. Thumbnail img 0108
    Jeffin Premium Member over 2 years ago

    Contain yourself, A.

     •  Reply
  9. Kaioc
    artmer  over 2 years ago

    Starting in the early 70’s, our jobs went from a worker making $25/hr in the USA, to $25/day in Mexico, to $25/week in China. Our woe is a direct result of rich business owner’s chasing profit ahead of our nation’s security and health.

     •  Reply
  10. 20211125 181455
    annefackler61  over 2 years ago

    Here in Virginia theres a company called Smithfield Foods (pork products). It was bought buy China 6 or 7 years ago.

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    david_42  over 2 years ago

    When you need everything to be cheap, because your job got shipped overseas…

     •  Reply
  12. Mr haney
    NeedaChuckle Premium Member over 2 years ago

    A container used to cost $2K each to ship from China, now it is from $13K to $19K. Used to take 6 days to unload, now 16 days.

     •  Reply
  13. Celtic tree of life
    mourdac Premium Member over 2 years ago

    Who would have thought this would occur when business owners shipped their companies to nations allowing workers to be paid pittances and have no safety/environmental laws that this might be a consequence?

     •  Reply
  14. Av
    Clotty Peristalt  over 2 years ago

    And that’s not even mentioning the outsourcing of much of our engineering know-how and a lot of entry-level jobs.

    I think it was Khrushchev who said something like “the capitalists will sell us the rope with which we’ll hang them.”

    This is what MBA management and short-term profit thinking gets you. In a way, I’m glad the pandemic came when it did. Maybe it’s not too late to have learnt something from it.

     •  Reply
  15. Scullyufo
    ScullyUFO  over 2 years ago

    Asians will put up with environmental hazards, pollution, lack of workplace safety, all at low wages, just to live another day. Westerners: not so much, especially those who can send their manufacturing expertise to Asia without any responsibility for improving working conditions there.

    This is the origin of the so called “supply chain” problem.

     •  Reply
  16. Tor johnson
    William Bednar Premium Member over 2 years ago

    Considering all the negative comment against China, why would anyone want a Socialist/Communist style Government here in the U.S.?

     •  Reply
  17. Image
    MuddyUSA  Premium Member over 2 years ago

    Yes Arlo, who could have???

     •  Reply
  18. Tyge
    Tyge Premium Member over 2 years ago

    Where’s the guy with the orange hair when you need him?

     •  Reply
  19. Photo
    DawnQuinn1  over 2 years ago

    Part of the “Made in the USA” issue is that the cost of production is VERY high and the main expense is wages. Yes, I know unions help provide high wages and benefits to workers, but they do NOT admit that high wages and benefits are a HUGE expense to manufacturers and employers, who pass those costs onto the consumer with high prices, which in turn cause unions to demand even higher wages. It is a never ending upward spiral.Producers outsourced production to countries that have a stable, lower wage. They can manufacture the products at lower cost and keep their prices competitive.Don’t always blame the producers. Look at where the REAL cost of production lay. If production costs could be kept stable, prices would remain stable as wellThe one item that defies this is oil. Producers like OPEC and Venezuela keep the supply low to keep prices high. That is the “Law Of Supply and Demand”. If demand is high and supply low, prices will be high. If supply is high and demand is low, prices will drop. Economics 101. If the demand for oil drops, and the supply remains stable, prices will drop. OPEC ALWAYS cuts the supply to force prices up. We NEED to cut our dependence on oil, but that will never happen as long as there are so many influential oil barons in the USA.

     •  Reply
  20. Fsm
    flying spaghetti monster  over 2 years ago

    The problem isn’t china, to quote pogo “We Have Met the Enemy and He Is Us”

     •  Reply
  21. Missing large
    Thanksfortheinfo2000  over 2 years ago

    Maybe this will shock us back to the less ‘conspicuous consumption’ days. Last year made a lot of weddings simpler. Perhaps this will begin to tame the ‘gotta have it now’ urge.

     •  Reply
  22. Missing large
    micromos  over 2 years ago

    Stay away from Asia. Of course we need to get rid of dopey joe first.

     •  Reply
  23. Aoh14gitbp9ssbcegbt qziexg nfnk78lendbxeguhr
    zbart778.  over 2 years ago

    arlo has a fine point

     •  Reply
  24. Missing large
    Thinkingblade  over 2 years ago

    So … we see the same problem (if in the US) if the supplier is in Mexico or South America there isn’t a boat, it is a train or a truck. We have the same problem with products getting from North Carolina to Los Angeles. The boat isn’t really the problem.

     •  Reply
  25. 20210517 082929
    flagmichael  over 2 years ago

    When Japan chose to make war against the United States in 1941 the only real concern was for the US’s industrial capacity. When the time to make “Liberty ships” dropped to an average of 30 days that concern became a genuine threat.

    I doubt that would apply today.

     •  Reply
  26. Santa  1 ram
    chief tommy  over 2 years ago

    Americans have to be willing to pay the much higher prices that would result from Made in America products. Can hear the hue and cry right now — never will happen

     •  Reply
  27. Death from above reduced size
    donwestonmysteries  over 2 years ago

    Panel 3 is right on. Remember when we shipped all those good paying jobs oversees and supplemented them with service jobs for Americans at minimum wage. Thanks big corporations for talking congress into thinking it was good for out economy.

     •  Reply
  28. Missing large
    Bruce1253  over 2 years ago

    Another unintended consequence of shipping most of our manufacturing to China is that we are paying for the military build up of China. An enemy we could very well find ourselves in a shooting war with in the next 5 – 10 years. China is practicing and training for an invasion of Taiwan.

     •  Reply
  29. Kea
    KEA  over 2 years ago

    Business people rarely take the long view, only what benefits short-term profits.

     •  Reply
  30. Spooky
    unca jim  over 2 years ago

    I try and TRY to explain the fact that the virus-infected northern coal fields of China which fuels the factories that ‘make our toys and products,’ all slowed down by ‘the virus’ that slows down shipping, which slows down trucking, which slows down EVERYTHING here, but NO !! It’s all ‘the present administration’s’ fault ! Jeeez !! Dominos, anyone??

     •  Reply
  31. Calvplay   2
    Mentor397  over 2 years ago

    And having them delivered Just In Time (JIT) with minimal backlog and storage surely didn’t help either.

     •  Reply
  32. Missing large
    lsnrchrd.1 Premium Member over 2 years ago

    Well, yeah, but when the decision was made Libertarian economics (neoliberalism) had been raised by the GOP to the pinnacle of national economic policy (aided in no small part by a large percentage of Democrats) during the Reagan administration.

    Off-shoring production not only benefited ROI (return on investment, ordained by god or somebody as the primary — all but sole — purpose of economic endeavor), it also inserted a poisoned-blade dagger into labor unionization. Capitol 100 – workers 0.

    Republicans gloated, thinking Game Over.

    Because what makes money today almost always — when reactionary conservatism is calling the shots — overrules any opposing point of view.

    And ruling capital holding elites in the 70’s/80’s were very focused on recovering unfavorable income distribution New Deal-~1975 (meaning middle class wealth [and then some!] that would have never eluded their grasp if not for economic/taxation policy during those approximately 40 years) that “belonged” to them, having been “stolen” unjustly. And squashing those inferior upstart working class bugs who dared “steal” wealth from them, to boot!

    What could possibly go wrong with their plan? All they did was return things to their “natural order”(sic) — a phrase often used by economic (and religious) conservatives to justify historical precedent based upon Appeal to Authority (“god’s plan” and “it has been/was always this way”).

    But has it ever been the most just, the most fair, even the most rational (pragmatic)? (from the right, in response: crickets)

     •  Reply
  33. 17089663590345538622707983594073
    David Huie Green ForceIsAUsefulFiction  over 2 years ago

    baskets and eggs.

     •  Reply
  34. 17089663590345538622707983594073
    David Huie Green ForceIsAUsefulFiction  over 2 years ago

    Mainly, need more points of entry, easier access.

    (and Three-D Printing)

     •  Reply
  35. Missing large
    lawguy05  over 2 years ago

    Indeed, Arlo!

     •  Reply
  36. Missing large
    dnotkin Premium Member over 2 years ago

    Thank goodness that goods don’t need to moved by truck or train as long as they’re made in the US. Also, I’m grateful that goods made in the US don’t need parts or components that originate from outside the country. Whew!

     •  Reply
  37. Obama e. neuman..
    cosman  over 2 years ago

    A week ago, there was around 65 vessels off Long Beach staged for docking.., now there’s over 100. Longshoremen management doesn’t want to pay overtime to catch up, to the point where the cascade effect will be biblical.

     •  Reply
  38. Aj icon60
    Dr_Fogg  over 2 years ago

    The government is paying people to stay home

     •  Reply
  39. Tumblr mbbz3vrusj1qdlmheo1 250
    Night-Gaunt49[Bozo is Boffo]  over 2 years ago

    The pollution is tremendous. We should make things here.

     •  Reply
  40. Dr cesspool
    byamrcn  over 2 years ago

    YES. Well said Mr. Johnson. This is what happens when decisions get made based on economic theory with no consideration for the larger consequences.

     •  Reply
  41. Cathy aack
    lindz.coop Premium Member over 2 years ago

    Yeah…what could possibly go wrong?

     •  Reply
  42. Picture
    EricS.Harris  over 2 years ago

    I can only hope that people realize the actual cause of the supply chain disruption, and not blame it nationalistic notions.

    Companies which switched to just-in-time inventory control underestimated the likelihood of an improbably-large delay in deliveries. So when governments created the disruptions in the supply chain by shutting down so much of the economy, they weren’t able to ride out the delays using warehoused parts/material.

    Companies that for years ate the cost of maintaining “too much” inventory were in a better position to stay in operation during times of supply-chain disruption. They could not only sell all they could make at typical prices, but even sell at higher prices.

    Of course, at that point, their reward for being prudent for all those years would not only be entirely justifiable higher profits to offset the lower profits from the years of investing in “too much” inventory, but anger from customers, and accusations of “gouging” from politicians — and possibly punishment.

    So, maybe those companies that supposedly underestimated the likelihood of an occasional supply-chain disruption did not. They knew their prudence wouldn’t be rewarded, but punished.

     •  Reply
  43. Img 4475
    carlosrivers  over 2 years ago

    Very well put…

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Arlo and Janis