Sort-of like Professor Farnsworth’s Glow-In-the-Dark Nose Machine, which produces large amounts of toxic waste, which is at least neatly poured into chemical drums.
No sweat, if it will run on coal, it will run on nuclear or geothermal. In fact, you could put nuclear underground and use the surrounding rocks for geothermal.
Not against electric cars, although I would argue there’s a better and proven way to do electric cars rather than have more onboard storage than is needed, but the issue is we don’t have enough distribution capacity in the grid for either solution. Some places are better than others, but overall, there’s a shortfall, so if we replace too many gas/diesel vehicles with electric equivalents, we will experience brown outs even during traditionally low usage periods. Then there’s the generation shortfall that needs to be dealt with if the distribution problem ever gets addressed.
rekam Premium Member 12 months ago
The cure is worse than the problem.
The Reader Premium Member 12 months ago
Double unfortunately, you live on a space station.
Ermine Notyours 12 months ago
Sort-of like Professor Farnsworth’s Glow-In-the-Dark Nose Machine, which produces large amounts of toxic waste, which is at least neatly poured into chemical drums.
pathamil 12 months ago
Just direct the smoke stacks into the CO2 scrubber…
rmercer Premium Member 12 months ago
It’s already been invented. It’s called a “tree”.
David Huie Green LosersBlameOthers&It'sYOURfault 12 months ago
No sweat, if it will run on coal, it will run on nuclear or geothermal. In fact, you could put nuclear underground and use the surrounding rocks for geothermal.
blakerl 12 months ago
Yep the people who bought Tesla’s, are now finding out 22% are powered by coal, 19% by nuclear, and 38% by natural gas.
paulprobujr 12 months ago
Not against electric cars, although I would argue there’s a better and proven way to do electric cars rather than have more onboard storage than is needed, but the issue is we don’t have enough distribution capacity in the grid for either solution. Some places are better than others, but overall, there’s a shortfall, so if we replace too many gas/diesel vehicles with electric equivalents, we will experience brown outs even during traditionally low usage periods. Then there’s the generation shortfall that needs to be dealt with if the distribution problem ever gets addressed.
Ebenezer Stooge Premium Member 12 months ago
We now have atmos-fear difficulties.
mistercatworks 12 months ago
Reminds me of the myth of “green” hydrogen as a fuel. Just had to be debunked again for the UK government.
Meg: All Seriousness Aside 12 months ago
That’s not bad. The original version ran on black rhinos.
jconnors3954 12 months ago
Farmers, orchardists and ranchers fight global warming. The crops and pastures sequesters carbon.
geese28 12 months ago
Yep bout as “green” as you can get
jtrevor99 12 months ago
It’s ok, so do electric cars.
paullp Premium Member 12 months ago
Back to the drawing board, doc.
The Orange Mailman 12 months ago
Well that certainly got everyone’s attention.
norphos 12 months ago
Green plants do the same thing without coal. Of course plant BECOME coal eventually.
syzygy47 12 months ago
Ah, that “clean beautiful coal” (skip the political attribution, Cliff fills the idiot quota)