Clay Bennett for July 08, 2022

  1. Ss 100419 volcano lightning 05.ss full
    chaosed2  5 months ago

    Way to push the narrative that rights are being taken away when what really happened was State’s rights were being protected. And as a bonus, maybe next time toss in that had Obama not used Roe v Wade as a precedent to justify having the authority to create the ACA the ruling would have not been up for review in the first place.

     •  Reply
  2. 3c777ff2 4bb1 47cd 9770 62ea9f8bab9b
    monya_43  5 months ago

    The test result is only autonomous in certain states in the US.

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    smartgrr  5 months ago

    ^^Maybe the analogy is a bit extreme, but this is akin to allowing each state the autonomy to decide whether or not slavery is legal. We fought a war over this.

     •  Reply
  4. Charlol
    DASch  5 months ago

    Maybe if so many of you hadn’t bought into all that fake news about Hillary committing ‘crimes’ we wouldn’t be stuck with this tyranny?

     •  Reply
  5. Img 1754  2
    GiantShetlandPony  5 months ago

    Yeah, face masks to protect everyone in society was tyranny from the government, but butting into women’s private medical decisions is quite OK.

    Will there be state boarder patrols requiring on spot pregnancy tests for women traveling out of the oppressive states?

    “Papers, we need you to pee on the papers.”

     •  Reply
  6. Smokey
    Zuhlamon Premium Member 5 months ago

    Not so funny how the (expletive) Magas were violent about having their “Rights and Freedoms destroyed” by those (expletive) “liberals” when told they needed to wear a mask in public. But they have no problem at all telling a woman that, no only can she not use birth control, but she will be forced to jeopardize her career, future earnings, health, and possibly her life because some (expletive) right-wing religious MEN mansplain that only they know what’s best for her.

    And BTW, that State’s Rights bull pucky and “just go to another state” crap is exactly that, since the (expletive) Magas want to make it THE LAW OF THE LAND!

    Got it? Comprende? Capisce? Understand?

     •  Reply
  7. Smokey
    Zuhlamon Premium Member 5 months ago

    And it’s not exactly what anybody with a brain would call a “Separation of Church and State”, when bible-thumping members of SCOTUS held prayer meetings in the Supreme Court Building with ultra-conservative religious fanatics who had lobbied for years to destroy Roe.

    Islam is perverted by extreme sects such as the Taliban and ISIS. Christians have their own flavor of extremists, too. Preaching bigotry, division, and hatred is still bigotry, division, and hatred when it’s in the name of religion.

     •  Reply
  8. 7bf81e16 8ef8 4134 8774 9ce680cc41b6
    The Nodding Head  5 months ago

    If one gets pregnant, it’s God’s will. One should not test God. So why are those items still legal in Texas, etc.?

     •  Reply
  9. Avat
    Radish the old word monger Premium Member 5 months ago

    LOL, No, Brett Kavanaugh Does Not Have a ‘Freedom’ and a ‘Right’ To Eat Dinner in Peace

    According to Politico, Kavanaugh was forced to exit through the back door of the Washington D.C. restaurant because a group of protesters had gathered outside.

    “Honorable Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh and all of our other patrons at the restaurant were unduly harassed by unruly protestors while eating dinner at our Morton’s restaurant,” the rep said. “Politics, regardless of your side or views, should not trample the freedom at play of the right to congregate and eat dinner. There is a time and place for everything. Disturbing the dinner of all of our customers was an act of selfishness and void of decency.”

    I agree with the rep that there is a time and place for protest, and when the issue at hand is the dehumanizing denial of half the population’s bodily autonomy, the time and place to protest that is all the time and everywhere. Also, there is no “right to congregate and eat dinner”. Maybe the rep is referring to the right to privacy in a manner not explicitly stated in the Constitution, which, as a reminder, was the foundation for Roe v Wade, which Kavanaugh and his fellow conservative justices just overturned.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/lol-no-brett-kavanaugh-does-not-have-a-freedom-and-a-right-to-eat-dinner-in-peace/ar-AAZmUzu?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=81dde4219f2f4eb3873ec56a7679a79b

     •  Reply
  10. Pat new 150
    Patjade Premium Member 5 months ago

    I wouldn’t be sure of any autonomy no matter what the results.

     •  Reply
  11. Beethoven 600x600jpg  1
    For a Just and Peaceful World  5 months ago

    Biden signs executive order aimed at safeguarding abortion rights.

    Executive Order on Protecting Access to Reproductive Healthcare Services

    JULY 08, 2022

    PRESIDENTIAL ACTIONS

    Federal Government is taking action to protect healthcare service delivery and promote access to critical reproductive healthcare services, including abortion. It remains the policy of my Administration to support women’s right to choose and to protect and defend reproductive rights. Doing so is essential to justice, equality, and our health, safety, and progress as a Nation.

    https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2022/07/08/executive-order-on-protecting-access-to-reproductive-healthcare-services/

    COMMENT: The order is too long to post. Read the entire order.

     •  Reply
  12. Avat
    Radish the old word monger Premium Member 5 months ago

    Restaurant sees spike in fake reservations after hosting Brett Kavanaugh

    ‘They have dozens of other locations across the country which are rapidly being booked by pro-choice protestors’

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/restaurant-fake-reservations-brett-kavanaugh-b2119125.html

     •  Reply
  13. Avat
    Radish the old word monger Premium Member 5 months ago

    A 10-year-old rape victim from Ohio traveled to Indiana for abortion care. Her provider braces for new restrictions: ‘She is not alone’

    Lawmakers in Indiana will consider new anti-abortion laws this summer, among the first states in a rush to criminalise care after the Supreme Court’s landmark decision. ‘It’s really stunning, the hypocrisy,’ Dr Caitlin Bernard, an obstetrician-gynecologist

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/indiana-abortion-caitlin-bernard-ohio-b2118423.html

     •  Reply
  14. Smokey
    Zuhlamon Premium Member 5 months ago

    It’s “State’s Rights” (and some sleaze-ball politician) to decide when and how a doctor can be permitted to decide when their Hippocratic Oath is best for their patients.

     •  Reply
  15. Katze avatar lg
    LeftCoastBoomer Premium Member 5 months ago

    If a MAN pees on this stick, he’ll get the AUTONOMY result.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Clay Bennett