Clay Jones for June 30, 2022

  1. Img 0668b
    Coopersdad  3 months ago

    Once they are born, you can do with them as you please!

     •  Reply
  2. Large triumph
    Daeder  3 months ago

    “We’re hungry. We’re cold. We’re lonely. We’re confused.”

    The GQP doesn’t care. They just wanted to force you to be here, despite the fact that your mother already had as many children as she could support. Too bad her birth control failed. Oh well, it’s not the GQP’s problem that your life is he-ll.

     •  Reply
  3. Img 0668b
    Coopersdad  3 months ago

    Elephants should hire a lawyer and sue Republicans for dishonoring their image!

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    PraiseofFolly  3 months ago

    The “saved” kids might eventually seem as numerous as drupelets on raspberry fruit. Or so plentiful that they will be as an over abundance of ripe tomatoes thrown around in some annual festival. Maybe the military draft will be reinstated to handle them and we can be tempted to participate in more wars to cull the herd. /s

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=h6S9ZIjegaY

     •  Reply
  5. Belushi
    Jack7528  3 months ago

    It shouldn’t be a problem. How about giving just a small amount of the money, to the poor, too poor to married couples.

     •  Reply
  6. Yin yang
    Havel  3 months ago

    Next to go, child labor laws? Then the GOP can claim the worker shortage is solved, right? And then their favorite restaurants won’t have to close!!!

     •  Reply
  7. Photo
    FrankErnesto  3 months ago

    Wait until Republicans discover that 80% of the babies being born are Black or brown babies, as white women manage to get abortions anyhow. Think they may panic?

     •  Reply
  8. 7bf81e16 8ef8 4134 8774 9ce680cc41b6
    The Nodding Head  3 months ago

    Does the Constitution mention compassion? Or morality? Or goodness? Then certainly the law need not pay attention to such weak-kneed concerns. Now get back to discussing what kind of ammo does the most damage to the human body,

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    RitaGB  3 months ago

    If a woman is forced to carry and give birth to a child she doesn’t want, she should hand it to the father and walk away. Full stop.

     •  Reply
  10. Lifi
    rossevrymn Premium Member 3 months ago

    basically

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    suzalee  3 months ago

    Sadly, unwanted children are often abused and grow up to be criminals. If we insist that they be born, it is our obligation to see that they have appropriate support during their formative years.

     •  Reply
  12. Image
    A Whiz  3 months ago

    If Democrats had been smart, and hopefully aware of how flawed the decision was 50 yrs ago, they should have pushed toward a Constitutional amendment. They’ve had 50 years to do something. My Democratic friends, now try to bring about a peaceful solution to unite the country.

     •  Reply
  13. B3710640 48e0 4fbd ac6f 162c3ba7fae0
    Zebrastripes  3 months ago

    So much concern about fetuses but no concern whey they’re born!

    So much concern about fetuses, but no concern to change gun laws!

    How convenient for the GOP…raking in millions from the NRA to vote NO on stricter gun laws…NRA takes bribe money from Russia….

     •  Reply
  14. Picture
    ibFrank  3 months ago

    Next year all Republicans will be complaining about the increased number of childrens being born to the poor only to get more welfare.

     •  Reply
  15. Bbb
    NeoconMan  3 months ago

    A vision of America’s future. Twenty years from now after abortion is outlawed, you will have about 64 million unwanted, fatherless, directionless youths roaming the streets in gangs. No education as you have cut that so they will not be employable. They will all have guns as you’ve made them available to everyone. They will all be hungry as you’ve cut social services. And they will be coming for you and yours.And as you go under, you’ll be screaming that it’s all the fault of the Democrats.

     •  Reply
  16. Download
    artegal  3 months ago

    Yeah, why should parents raise their children when we have a government?

     •  Reply
  17. Can flag
    Alberta Oil Premium Member 3 months ago

    All perfectly formed.. each one a potential gold medal champion, a Mozart or Einstein. Americas worries are over just as soon as this lot comes of age.

     •  Reply
  18. B3b2b771 4dd5 4067 bfef 5ade241cb8c2
    cdward  3 months ago

    They’re all for theoretical people but have only contempt for actual people.

     •  Reply
  19. 20200319 192925
    IndyW  3 months ago

    I don’t know how things are done in Jones state, but in my red state a heck of lot is being done for child welfare and development. It is asinine to believe republican people do not care about their children, what a foolish implied and insulting concept. Because I’m a republican I don’t love or want to take care of my kids?

     •  Reply
  20. Saurichia
    Saurischia Premium Member 3 months ago

    It is all about controlling women. Period. Everything else they say is a red herring.

     •  Reply
  21. Missing large
    casonia2  3 months ago

    Nailed it, Clay.

     •  Reply
  22. Missing large
    PraiseofFolly  3 months ago

    @cdward

    The Theoretical People Vote will, in future, provide limitless possibilities for the political Party who can claim the most of them. The unfair rejection of Trump’s “theoretical people” vote in Georgia, for instance, is what caused him to lose the election, according to him. /s

    The Theoreticals seem to be related to The Silent Majority for Nixon/Agnew, that con-vinced so many that administration policies were accepted overwhelmingly by voters sick of Democrat nabobs of negativism. They were just too pusillanimous to say so out loud. /s

    When Fundamentalist masses of voters in great numbers were perceived as a great political force, The Moral Majority claimed its place. And they picked a great name; for who would oppose them — The Immoral Majority? Democrats surely painted themselves into a corner that time (Sorry, Shirley). /s

    And now a new faction of Theoretical People may lay claim (REALLY theoretically) through Right-To-Lifers, as yet-unborn citizens, to be included as a political force to be reckoned with. Saved from abortion oblivion, they are doubtless grateful in an existentialist way. Scientology engrams have been imprinted on their psyches that will endure through birth to adulthood. And subtly and gradually they will realize Conservatives saved them — and will, it is hoped, vote The Right way. /s

    Republican Conservative Government is the Wave of the Future! “Let them come to Berlin” … er, I mean Florida, Mississippi, Texas, and so on. /s

     •  Reply
  23. Smokey
    Zuhlamon Premium Member 3 months ago

    Calling a zygote a “baby” is like calling a B-flat from a Tuba a “Symphony”.

     •  Reply
  24. Missing large
    tauyen  3 months ago

    not to worry – the 2nd Amendment will take care of them /s

     •  Reply
  25. Mel and linda 013
    Melki Premium Member 3 months ago

    So, I guess we’ll be celebrating Conception Days instead of Birthdays from now on. Yippee! That means I’m eligible for Social Security a whole nine months earlier! (Unless that’s the next thing the Supremes decide to take away . . . )

     •  Reply
  26. Missing large
    randolini Premium Member 3 months ago

    And there you have the difference between pro fetus and pro life.

     •  Reply
  27. Snetd
    Snetd  3 months ago

    This is exactly what is happening. Bring them into the world and then don’t take care of them. The Republican dogma.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Clay Jones