Some conservative judges gave us a very bigly surprise. This is really going to piss off some conservative preachers. It will give Tiny another subject to tweet about. The LBBTQ community gets some protection from employment discrimination. Everybody gets something.
It still amazes me that 3 Justices found BS reasons to dissent against protections from discrimination. For them to claim they were against legislating from the bench is the epitome of hypocrisy. Conservative judges do it all the time. Affluency and privilege wasn’t a legitimate thing until Conservative judges made it so in several rulings involving wealthy, privileged young White men.
Can’t wait for Trump to tweet about Gorsuch betraying his boss. It might be that G., realizing that he got this position as the result of some really shady dealings, is trying to show that he’es really no puppet. Oh, yeah: there’s also the merits of the case.
Don’t break out the party hats just yet. The decision was limited to workplace discrimination. You can still refuse health care, housing and other services to someone for being gay. At least this is a step in the right direction.
So making the lives of a small minority miserable is the top priority of a vile wannabe dictator and the Republican so-called “Party”… ? It’s not like there’s anything else “important” going on…
Oh yeah, that’s right. It’s “too hard” for actual governance. It’s more betterer to just work on grabbing power and satisfying your bigoted, single-issue “base” of bigots and religious nuts.
martens almost 3 years ago
The evangelicals are simply beside themselves at Gorsuch’s “treason”. Poor babies…
brwydave Premium Member almost 3 years ago
Some conservative judges gave us a very bigly surprise. This is really going to piss off some conservative preachers. It will give Tiny another subject to tweet about. The LBBTQ community gets some protection from employment discrimination. Everybody gets something.
ndblackirish97 almost 3 years ago
It still amazes me that 3 Justices found BS reasons to dissent against protections from discrimination. For them to claim they were against legislating from the bench is the epitome of hypocrisy. Conservative judges do it all the time. Affluency and privilege wasn’t a legitimate thing until Conservative judges made it so in several rulings involving wealthy, privileged young White men.
Alberta Oil Premium Member almost 3 years ago
Lets wait and see how they rule on trumps taxes.. this could have been a token so they could claim impartial fairness.
Radish the old word monger Premium Member almost 3 years ago
Racist gay basher Trump the crooked liar is very disappointed.
Not the Smartest Man On the Planet -- Maybe Close Premium Member almost 3 years ago
Nice.
The Love of Money is . . . almost 3 years ago
There is a God ! Boy, are the evangelicals money changers are going to be surprised.
wsedrel Premium Member almost 3 years ago
Can’t wait for Trump to tweet about Gorsuch betraying his boss. It might be that G., realizing that he got this position as the result of some really shady dealings, is trying to show that he’es really no puppet. Oh, yeah: there’s also the merits of the case.
Retired engineer almost 3 years ago
Don’t break out the party hats just yet. The decision was limited to workplace discrimination. You can still refuse health care, housing and other services to someone for being gay. At least this is a step in the right direction.
Zuhlamon Premium Member almost 3 years ago
So making the lives of a small minority miserable is the top priority of a vile wannabe dictator and the Republican so-called “Party”… ? It’s not like there’s anything else “important” going on…
Oh yeah, that’s right. It’s “too hard” for actual governance. It’s more betterer to just work on grabbing power and satisfying your bigoted, single-issue “base” of bigots and religious nuts.
tee929 almost 3 years ago
One less brick in the Dumpster wall…..
pamela welch Premium Member almost 3 years ago
Great artwork!