yes yes yes
to imply any association between these two is an insult to President Washington. Washington led a revolution against a tyrant, Obama wants to lead a tyrannical government.
He hasn’t done it for the last 40 years I don’t see him doing it now
dear genome who gave the head marching orders?
yes lichtentunes if you criticize bho you must be a racist
Put the card back in the deck.
Yes, some of Obama’s critics are racist. But not all. Not, I believe, even the vast majority. Along those lines, it also smacks of bigotry to say he’s doing well as President because he is black. And yes, there are some of his supporters who base their support of him on that. Not all. Not even many. But a few.
Obama is a terrible president. Maybe better than Bush, but that’s saying very little. The bigger issue is the two parties who have both utterly failed at this point to represent the vast majority of Americans. Neither party can produce a good candidate. Neither party can compromise. And neither party is willing to go beyond name calling.
This thread being a case in point.
Amazing folks absorb the mythology of “The Acting President”, and all the scandals and outright criminality, and spying on citizens, and illegal wars on foreigners and our own citizens, and the double dealing in that initiation of the “War on Drugs” when his AG was one of the biggest dealers. Yes, one still must go a long, long, way to beat the Reagan administration for scandal and corruption. (But Reagan’s folks had GHW to pardon them after their convictions.)
May 31, 2016
May 24, 2016