Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller for April 09, 2014

  1. 654px red eyed tree frog   litoria chloris edit1
    Superfrog  almost 9 years ago

    For goodness sake. Surely that’s for the foreman to decide.

     •  Reply
  2. Other7 brush
    Meh~tdology, fka Pepelaputr   almost 9 years ago

    Float is guilty, drown is not guilty.

     •  Reply
  3. 11 06 126
    Varnes  almost 9 years ago

    I’ve been part of a jury….Getting twelve people to agree on even the most obvious of facts is impossible….Cat wrangling comes to mind….I’m surprised that anybody is ever convicted……Seriously, people all you have to do is convince one person there is some doubt, and you walz away Scott free…..

     •  Reply
  4. 11 06 126
    Varnes  almost 9 years ago

    There was one lady that agreed that the guy beat the other guy in the face with a 2 by 4, and almost killed him, but thought he would change his ways, and another guy who said the victim deserved what he got… They both would not accept the blood on the 2 by 4 was the victims….They didn’t have the DNA…..The judge told us later that shows like CSI have changed jurors expectations….Witness accounts are less believable…If they had done the DNA on the blood on the 2 by 4 the assholes would changed their vote…. ……… Be not proud of the our jury system……. but it is the best there is….

     •  Reply
  5. Scribble can
    Three Steps Over Japan  almost 9 years ago

    Judge: “Tell them that if they still have money in their pockets that there’s something wrong with the system. Collect the coin and put it in the tip jar with the others.”

     •  Reply
  6. Camera1 016
    keenanthelibrarian  almost 9 years ago

    Are we saying that jujes’ considerations are worked out on the toss of a coin?? I always thought so! How cinical of me.

     •  Reply
  7. Downloadfile
    Guilty Bystander  almost 9 years ago

    As if judges are flawless and above incompetence and/or corruption.

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    vwdualnomand  almost 9 years ago

    corporations are people.

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    dabugger  almost 9 years ago

    Yes, that is why some we know of walked.

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    watmiwori  almost 9 years ago

    gelt gilt. always has, always will.

     •  Reply
  11. 04 jo jo the dog faced boy
    jamesgilbreth  almost 9 years ago

    At least that way, you’d have an even chance.

     •  Reply
  12. Celtic tree of life
    mourdac Premium Member almost 9 years ago

    make sure one of the lawyers doesn’t nab the coin after they’re done with it

     •  Reply
  13. 1175703 628288277203175 166978261 n
    Caddy57  almost 9 years ago

    The judge should go to the bailiff and whisper in his ear " Heads is guilty,tails is not innocent,tee time in one hour " Hey it seems that way some times….depending…if you know what I mean.

     •  Reply
  14. 1175703 628288277203175 166978261 n
    Caddy57  almost 9 years ago

    And what would that one judge, the one with mental issues have said? “Off with their heads” speaking of course of the jury, not the accused.

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    neeeurothrush  almost 9 years ago

    civil or criminal? it makes a difference

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    strictures  almost 9 years ago

    They weren’t mentioned in the trial & you can’t always tell, especially depending on the quality of the surgeon, the type & shape of the implants & the clothing worn at that time!

     •  Reply
  17. Aj icon60
    Dr_Fogg  almost 9 years ago

    Public hangings?

     •  Reply
  18. Barnette
    Enoki  almost 9 years ago

    Hey, better that than taking your chances with twelve people picked by liars,… err… lawyers for their malleability, lack of intelligence, and having nothing better to do than sit through a trial…

     •  Reply
  19. Missing large
    omgomg  almost 9 years ago

    @ Tigger O.J.’s blood was NOT found at the crime scene. In the words of Rep. Joe Wilson, You LIE.

     •  Reply
  20. Duck1275
    Brass Orchid Premium Member almost 9 years ago

    We will require both a goat and a chicken. Jury duty is too serious a matter to be left to the reading of only one set of entrails. And if you could scare up a grill and a keg of beer, that would be great.

     •  Reply
  21. Thinker1
    Fan o’ Lio.  almost 9 years ago

    Give him a fair trial then take him out and hang him.

     •  Reply
  22. 247d312b02898fc6de5c1275a9478845 zps56df1dff
    MsMistoffeles14  almost 9 years ago

    This is actually possible given the quality of juries nowdays.

     •  Reply
  23. Missing large
    westny77  almost 9 years ago

    The jury is trying to tell you something Judge. They want to be disqualified.

     •  Reply
  24. 9715
    nerual53 Premium Member almost 9 years ago

    Heads I win, Tails you lose

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Non Sequitur