Missing large

"It's the End of the World!!!" Premium

Comics I Follow

B.C.

B.C.

By Mastroianni and Hart
The Born Loser

The Born Loser

By Art and Chip Sansom
Brevity

Brevity

By Dan Thompson
Calvin and Hobbes

Calvin and Hobbes

By Bill Watterson
Close to Home

Close to Home

By John McPherson
The Duplex

The Duplex

By Glenn McCoy
The Flying McCoys

The Flying McCoys

By Glenn McCoy and Gary McCoy
FoxTrot

FoxTrot

By Bill Amend
FoxTrot Classics

FoxTrot Classics

By Bill Amend
Frank and Ernest

Frank and Ernest

By Thaves
Fred Basset

Fred Basset

By Alex Graham
Free Range

Free Range

By Bill Whitehead
Garfield

Garfield

By Jim Davis
Gray Matters

Gray Matters

By Stuart Carlson and Jerry Resler
Herman

Herman

By Jim Unger
Marmaduke

Marmaduke

By Brad Anderson
Nancy

Nancy

By Olivia Jaimes
Nancy Classics

Nancy Classics

By Ernie Bushmiller
Off the Mark

Off the Mark

By Mark Parisi
Pickles

Pickles

By Brian Crane
Sherman's Lagoon

Sherman's Lagoon

By Jim Toomey
Shoe

Shoe

By Gary Brookins and Susie MacNelly
Speed Bump

Speed Bump

By Dave Coverly
Win, Lose, Drew

Win, Lose, Drew

By Drew Litton
Wizard of Id

Wizard of Id

By Parker and Hart
Wizard of Id Classics

Wizard of Id Classics

By Parker and Hart
Working It Out

Working It Out

By Charlos Gary
WuMo

WuMo

By Wulff & Morgenthaler
Ziggy

Ziggy

By Tom Wilson & Tom II
Lalo Alcaraz

Lalo Alcaraz

Nick Anderson

Nick Anderson

Robert Ariail

Robert Ariail

Clay Bennett

Clay Bennett

Lisa Benson

Lisa Benson

Steve Benson

Steve Benson

Chip Bok

Chip Bok

Matt Bors

Matt Bors

Steve Breen

Steve Breen

Chris Britt

Chris Britt

Stuart Carlson

Stuart Carlson

Jeff Danziger

Jeff Danziger

Matt Davies

Matt Davies

John Deering

John Deering

Bob Gorrell

Bob Gorrell

Walt Handelsman

Walt Handelsman

Joe Heller

Joe Heller

Kevin Kallaugher

Kevin Kallaugher

By KAL
Steve Kelley

Steve Kelley

Mike Lester

Mike Lester

Mike Luckovich

Mike Luckovich

Gary Markstein

Gary Markstein

Jim Morin

Jim Morin

Jack Ohman

Jack Ohman

Pat Oliphant

Pat Oliphant

Henry Payne

Henry Payne

Joel Pett

Joel Pett

Ted Rall

Ted Rall

Michael Ramirez

Michael Ramirez

Marshall Ramsey

Marshall Ramsey

Rob Rogers

Rob Rogers

Drew Sheneman

Drew Sheneman

Jeff Stahler

Jeff Stahler

Scott Stantis

Scott Stantis

Dana Summers

Dana Summers

(th)ink

(th)ink

By Keith Knight
Tom Toles

Tom Toles

Gary Varvel

Gary Varvel

ViewsAfrica

ViewsAfrica

By CartoonArts International
ViewsAmerica

ViewsAmerica

By CartoonArts International
ViewsAsia

ViewsAsia

By CartoonArts International
ViewsBusiness

ViewsBusiness

By CartoonArts International
ViewsEurope

ViewsEurope

By CartoonArts International
ViewsLatinAmerica

ViewsLatinAmerica

By CartoonArts International
ViewsMidEast

ViewsMidEast

By CartoonArts International
Views of the World

Views of the World

By CartoonArts International
Signe Wilkinson

Signe Wilkinson

Matt Wuerker

Matt Wuerker

Jen Sorensen

Jen Sorensen

Phil Hands

Phil Hands

Clay Jones

Clay Jones

Brian McFadden

Brian McFadden

Recent Comments

  1. 1 day ago on Clay Jones

    Olddog04 – Well, speaking as the child of an addict, and my 26 years in medicine I will disagree that sending someone to jail for marijuana possessions is most certainly not ridiculous.

    I’ve taken care of children who are using their parent’s weed, or who got ahold of the used joint and swallowed it. We’re seeing a massive spike of it in medicine:

    https://www.cnn.com/2017/08/14/health/marijuana-intoxication-children-france-study

    https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/er-visits-kids-rise-significantly-after-pot-legalized-colorado-n754781

    Then there’s the increase in DUIs:

    https://newsroom.aaa.com/2020/01/fatal-crashes-involving-drivers-who-test-positive-for-marijuana-increase-after-state-legalizes-drug/

    Marijuana is by far not purely safe. Safer perhaps than opioids, meth, etc…,

    Marijuana legalization has become far more about being profit driven (for the state) when legalized by politicians. But you apparently only care about profit from prison.

    So maybe, just maybe there is a reason for it in some cases.

  2. 1 day ago on ViewsEurope

    Continued:

    Wahl’s book documents this evolution: “Ideologies of [today’s] radical right emphasize social and economic threats in the modern and postmodern world (e.g., globalization, immigration). The radical right also promises protection against such threats by an emphatic ethnic construction of ‘we’, the people, as a familiar, homogeneous in-group, anti-modern, or reactionary structures of family, society, an authoritarian state, nationalism, the discrimination, or exclusion of immigrants and other minorities … While favoring traditional social and cultural structures (traditional family and gender roles, religion, etc.) the radical right uses modern technologies and it does not ascribe to a specific economic policy; some parties advocate a liberal, free-market policy, but other parties advocate a welfare state policy. Finally, the radical right can be scaled by using different degrees of militancy and aggressiveness from right-wing populism to racism, terrorism, and totalitarianism.”11

    Ultraright groups, as The Radical Right definition states, are normally called “far-right” groups,12 but they may also be called “radical right” groups.13 According to Clive Webb, “Radical right is commonly, but not exclusively used to describe anticommunist organizations such as the Christian Crusade and the John Birch Society… [T]he term far right … is the label most broadly used by scholars … to describe militant white supremacists.”14

  3. 1 day ago on ViewsEurope

    Egidus: Even more fun is the very first sentence or two that don’t even define it:

    Among academics and social scientists, there is disagreement over how right-wing political movement should be described, and no consensus over what the proper terminology should be exists, although the terminology which was developed in the 1950s, based on the use of the words “radical” or “extremist”, is the most commonly used one. Other scholars simply prefer to call them “The Right” or “conservatives”, which is what they call themselves. The terminology is used to describe a broad range of movements.5 The term “radical right” was coined by Seymour Martin Lipset and it was also included in a book titled The New American Right, which was published in 1955.7 The contributors to that book identified a conservative “responsible Right” as represented by the Republican administration of Dwight D. Eisenhower and a radical right that wished to change political and social life.8 Further to the right of the radical right, they identified themselves as the “ultraright”, adherents of which advocated drastic change, but they only used violence against the state in extreme cases. In the decades since, the ultraright, while adopting the basic ideology of the 1950s radical right,9 has updated it to encompass what it sees as “threats” posed by the modern world. It has leveraged fear of those threats to draw new adherents, and to encourage support of a more militant approach to countering these perceived threats. A more recent book by Klaus Wahl, The Radical Right, contrasts the radical right of the 1950s, which obtained influence during the Reagan administration, to the radical right of today, which has increasingly turned to violent acts beginning with the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995.1210

  4. 1 day ago on ViewsEurope

    Egidius – so after all of your whining, complaining, protestations, p!ssing, and moaning that seems to have taken you just a few seconds to find.

  5. 1 day ago on Jeff Danziger

    zxcar1 – It’s not about having the last post. I don’t play your little game where you whine about someone having a last word, but then feel the need to go out of your way to respond to my point, while ranting about how you have other things that are more important in your life to do than respond to me…….but do so while you are responding to me.

    I didn’t link an article. I didn’t reference an article. When I do, I try to ensure that I point the link with it. If I don’t, and someone calls me on it, I will then post said link and apologize for not doing so. Not whine about it.

    But once again, you keep doing you.

  6. 1 day ago on Nick Anderson

    tabby – I also never accused you of saying it. I was making a clarifying point. See, if you stopped making assumptions you might not perceive your words as being twisted around. Take what I write as black and white.

  7. 1 day ago on Nick Anderson

    tabby – The totality of events on 6 January have been described collectively as an insurrection. It is the media and politicians and left that use the all inclusive descriptor.

    IF, and I have never said there isn’t one, IF there is a direct link from the President or ANYONE in the Trump administration before or during the protest and riots that show they were pushing for violence or harm to anyone in the Capitol then I’ll be right there in line calling for the buffoon that is Trump to be tried. That has not existed. In 32 months not one single, solitary shred of direct evidence has shown this link. The FBI, DOJ, and congressional investigation has shown NO link. It’s hopes and dreams and wants and needs and desires to put Trump away. But NOTHING has been shown. Most we get is a story of a story told before Congress that Trump jumped between two seats of an armored Suburban to grab the wheel (yet the USSS has denied this with agents REQUESTING to testify that this did not occur), and he just might have been ticked off enough to flip a plate of spaghetti against the wall. Oooooooooh.

    I don’t twist your words. I use EXACTLY what you write. If you don’t like it, then don’t engage. But I guess we’ll see you next time. Maybe, and I’m just spitballing here, just MAYBE you should write more appropriately.

  8. 1 day ago on Jeff Danziger

    zxcar1 – So you admit to doing a web search and got a whole page supporting your position….Oooooh. But you couldn’t be troubled to cut and past the link to article…but you did post the article.

    Class or not, it’s pretty accepted to back something up.

    Excuse me for having some level of expectation you choose to not meet, no matter how low that level is.

  9. 1 day ago on Jeff Danziger

    zxcar1 – You did provide the source, no actual link to articles. But you had to be asked to do it.

  10. 1 day ago on Clay Jones

    tompet. Please provide a link to support your assertion that 30% are in prison for marijuana.

    I did a nice little search and found that about 40,000 are in prison for it. Now, I went to public school but even my unenlightened non-elite mathematics teaching tells me that 40,000 doesn’t even come close to 30% of the prison population.

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/joanoleck/2020/06/26/with-40000-americans-incarcerated-for-marijuana-offenses-the-cannabis-industry-needs-to-step-up-activists-said-this-week/?sh=1782ae4ac16f

    https://www.lastprisonerproject.org/cannabis-prisoner-scale

    You really ought to correct your ignorance. Or if you aren’t ignorant, you ought to stop posting known lies just to make your hyperbolic point. But that’d be just silly wouldn’t it?