I will save this thread for future reference to show to people as a textbook example of sealioning.
Your words have made it evident that this is a dishonest question. You have made zero effort to disprove this observation. I don’t need an excuse to ignore a dishonest question. I simply make an assertion that I will not answer it. No justification required.
Actually, by this point, I KNOW it is a dishonest question.
I already answered. Yet once again you don’t accept answers given.
I will repeat myself:I know a dishonest question when I see it, and I’m not taking the bait.
Are you suggesting that this is what modern indigenous people look like? Are you that out of touch?
The Braves mascot and the “tomahawk chop” are both stereotyping indigenous people as being stuck in the past, or even worse, something that doesn’t exist anymore. And this comic shows that you also feel this way.
In a sense… you have proven that there is a problem.
Maybe “assertively” if you don’t like “aggressively”, either way, there is a lot of demanding going on.
If you wanted to know what the written definition of “far right” is… well you could look it up yourself. You have had six days to look it up, yet you haven’t… so I honestly don’t believe that you want to know what the written definition is. You don’t want to know what far right means. It would be a complete waste of time for me put time into providing something for you that you don’t actually want. I know a dishonest question when I see it, and I’m not taking the bait.
You repeatedly fail to explain why you are not satisfied with the terms used in the cartoon. That’s the aspects of the “far right” that are of concern. It is there “in black and white” and has been since before you posted anything… Read the words in the cartoon. That’s what we are talking about. How could we be possibly talking about anything else?You are aggressively asking an irrational question and getting mad at everyone for not responding. How can we respond when you aren’t making sense?
All you need to do is read the cartoon above, it already explains what “far right” is. Why would I need to provide you a link to a page you are already on?
A cartoon says “far right parties are growing”, the cartoon also says "this is what I mean when I say ‘far right’ "
And you still want to “know exactly where we are arguing a point from.”??
And you accuse me of semantics.
There is zero reason for you to be confused, so I can only assume that you are pretending to not understand… which is a strange debate tactic.
If you don’t know what the word means, why are you arguing about it?
The concepts in this cartoon are agreed upon characteristics of “far right” values. It has nothing to do with my opinion.