i know but thought it was a funny even thought not so factual. if you want fac… ( sort of ) joan of arch, or Boudicca. Nany of the maroons. those i can think of off top of my head. i think there are more in history but will have to do research which i do not want to. as to be fair does it matter
helon of troy :)
that whould have been a better headline for webmd
Interpretation The timeframe for reinfection is fundamental to numerous aspects of public health decision making.As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, reinfection is likely to become increasingly common. Maintaining publichealth measures that curb transmission—including among individuals who were previously infected withSARS-CoV-2—coupled with persistent efforts to accelerate vaccination worldwide is critical to the prevention ofCOVID-19 morbidity and mortality.
flue shot has not made me too sick to work for a week after last covid vax did.
endemic transmission for SARS-CoV-2, as well as the other human-infecting coronaviruses" in my rant and i still think it rings true. the article head line mis-represnt the research. as at the very least i expected a vax v unvax information. not the fact that in essence this is saying this is going to be an endemic and vaccination like the flue jab will be good in helping out as there is no real imunity from covid viruses in general and including this one. also safer topic to discuss that the other part of that comic :>
on last thing because… the lead researcher “seams to be” Jeffrey P. Townsend is an American biostatistician and evolutionary biologist. a statastion not a immunologist or Vaccinologist (i think is what they are called) so i think from the little statistics i rember his sample size is too small and not varied enough.any way as i know most will ignore this and to be fair its not the appropriate format. i am not flaming the comic thought i think he could have been a little more even handed in his critisism of the extreams but its still funny
actualy it was there. the information was pulled from june 2021 so a year ago. if i am reading correcly used PubMed and Google Scholar for they information. no references that i can find. used 6 human examples and extrapolated the results using prier covid (flu research ) without mentioning if they had sources from any one with the vaccine. so paper seems to be analysis of un mentioned papers. and before you flame me to death. from informaiton i had did my own risk v reward and am triple vax thought. not sure about doing a 4,5,6 booster.
interesting article. the contents of it and then read https://www.webmd.com/vaccines/covid-19-vaccine/covid-19-vaccine-booster#1 … i whould like to see a transcript of the full conversation as i suspect its not as black and white as y’ll asuming
not sure i understand because its as popular with persons as you say. surly you vote in you state representatives to do your biding. would your protection be better served in your state law vs in the interpretation of the supreme courts. which we are seeing can change on a dime
color balance is off
are you saying no to protests or just no to protests that you do not like ?