I’m happy to be on salary. I just put down how many hours I worked. My wife, who is hourly, has to punch in when she starts, punch out when she takes lunch, punch back in after lunch, punch out at the end of the day, etc. That’s just tedious.
Plus, in some places, there’s a limit on how much a non-exempt employee can make. If you’re close to that limit, and want to stay exempt, I guess you don’t want any raises, either. :-D
Unions had a time and place, but have long since outlived their usefulness. Now Union bosses are only in it for them selves. To many people have not read or understood what the book Animal Farms is about. But it is relevant in what unions are all about these days.
I’m not pro-union by any means. Yes, they had their place in the early 1900s, but I think it’s more like a pendulum. They get too powerful (see the 1970s), then less powerful, then too powerful.
When unions gave concessions to auto companies after the Great Recession, and didn’t get those concessions back later, I can understand the workers being upset.
On the other hand, California requiring most fast food workers get paid $20 per hour (while regular retail workers get $16 per hour) because unions made a deal with Newsom seems wrong.
Yes, Madison (from Virginia and a slaveholder) knew that a compromise was necessary — both because of slavery and because of the tension between “big” and “small” states.
That doesn’t mean the Electoral College primarily driven by slavery. We don’t have slavery today (or even the 3/5 rule), so apparently the powers that were back then that eliminated slavery still thought the Electoral College was worthy of keeping.
I do wish they’d get rid of winner-takes-all, though, like New Hampshire and Nebraska.
Bezos or Musk?