Rob Rogers for May 02, 2017

  1. Tumblr mbbz3vrusj1qdlmheo1 250
    Night-Gaunt49[Bozo is Boffo]  almost 7 years ago

    Hate speech is Free Speech. It is the very reason for that speech. For Friendly speech doesn’t need protection, just the ones some of us don’t want to hear.

     •  Reply
  2. E067 169 48
    Darsan54 Premium Member almost 7 years ago

    The First Amendment guarantees repulsive opinions are protected, but so is the criticism of the hateful speech. Coulter and company are trying to spin protests as intolerant but it’s only manipulation.

     •  Reply
  3. Airhornmissc
    Liverlips McCracken Premium Member almost 7 years ago

    Both Night-Gaunt and Darsan are right.

    If anyone’s right to free speech was violated, it could only be Ms. Coulter. That is an argument that can and should be made. But not by me. I plead utter ignorance of the circumstances of her planned talk. But if she was to be paid for her appearance, then I’m sure there is a clause in the contract that allows the sponsor to withdraw the invitation and presumably pay a cancellation fee. If there is money involved, then I would argue that it is not “free speech” in either a figurative or a literal sense.

    What Darsan points out mirrors what I have said in these comment pages multiple times in the past. It is the height of hypocrisy to scold me for not tolerating your intolerance.

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    billsarar  almost 7 years ago

    Everyone’s was violated. When one voice is silenced, all should listen harder.

     •  Reply
  5. 7553c0eb fe60 48a8 a4b6 2f89cdbcf5ac
    RonnieAThompson Premium Member almost 7 years ago

    I agree with BILLSARAR.

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    twclix  almost 7 years ago

    The thing is, I’ve listened to trump supporters, I’ve listened to the tea party, I’ve listened to the religious right, and I’ve listened to Coulter, Limbaugh and O’Reilly, I’ve paid close attention to the republicans for many years. That’s exactly why I am no longer a middle-of-the-road republican anymore. The stuff they spout is largely ignorant and stupid. I HAVE been paying attention to them. The problem is that these folks never seem to make sense in the real world where people actually live. If the conservatives have such great practical and sensible ideas to promote, then exactly what are those ideas?

    Coulter has a right to speak and the protesters have a right to protest. The university has an obligation to provide safe venues for such activities. There’s no place for violence, but it’s really easy to see how violence can break out. Both Coulter and the protesters are at fault. Coulter herself, because she is hateful and inflammatory. The protesters because a few were violent. But make no mistake, Coulter’s entire sick, twisted shtick is simply self-promotion. She’s like poor demented trump in that regard. Or PT Barnum.

     •  Reply
  7. Puff ava
    Robert Allen  almost 7 years ago

    Is that Trump hiding under that hat?

     •  Reply
  8. Gatti bellissimi sacro di birmania birmano leggenda
    montessoriteacher  almost 7 years ago

    Some of these folks do incite violence so that is an issue too. I guess the kkk and nazis are protected, but we can’t allow them to railroad us under the guise of free speech.

     •  Reply
  9. Comic
    Pipe Tobacco Premium Member almost 7 years ago

    The hard thing is that all the protests was to give more weight to the message of Coulter. Her free speech was violated by the protestors and the University. I can understand why they were protesting her message, because I do not like her messages either. But, shutting her down like they did gives her message more power, and makes freedom of speech a much shakier proposition. Who will be powerful enough to stop the next message…. perhaps one we would want to hear?

     •  Reply
  10. Desron14
    Masterskrain Premium Member almost 7 years ago

    “Ms.” Coulter is ALL for “Free Speech”…as long as she is PAID for it.

     •  Reply
  11. Video snapshot
    Baslim the Beggar Premium Member almost 7 years ago

    Coulter has been “silenced”? Really? Seems like she was just on TV. That’s not “being silenced.”

     •  Reply
  12. Image
    magicwalnut Premium Member almost 7 years ago

    A similar situation occurred at the university at which I worked. The university held that disgusting opinions were educational, that students should hear both “sides” of the story and make up their own minds. I can’t remember, though, whether he was eventually cancelled or not.

     •  Reply
  13. Albert einstein brain i6
    braindead Premium Member almost 7 years ago

    Ann Coulter’s freedom of speech is being totally violated.

    You know, like totally.


    I mean, all her published press releases, all her interviews, all her tweets, and her TV appearances said so.


    And I’ve heard she will have a book coming out about it.

     •  Reply
  14. Agent gates
    Radish the wordsmith  almost 7 years ago

    Coulter took to her verified Twitter account Wednesday to say the university canceled her speech, but UC Berkeley said it had never been officially scheduled.University spokesman Dan Mogulof said: “Ms. Coulter and speakers regardless of their position are welcome on this campus.”

     •  Reply
  15. Img 0048
    Nantucket Premium Member almost 7 years ago

    There was NO violation of free speech as specified in the First Amendment. Ann Coulter could have gone to Berkeley and started talking – unless she gets arrested for this, there isn’t a violation of free speech. Protesters were allowed to protest, so again – NO VIOLATION.

     •  Reply
  16. Tumblr mbbz3vrusj1qdlmheo1 250
    Night-Gaunt49[Bozo is Boffo]  almost 7 years ago

    Even protesting is okay just so long there is no move to intimidate others to not come. That would be a violation.

     •  Reply
  17. Agent gates
    Radish the wordsmith  almost 7 years ago

    The violation is that the right wing is making a big stink over something they created.

     •  Reply
  18. Image001
    dogday Premium Member almost 7 years ago

    See, it’s all a matter of prepositions: One side is talking about freedom OF speech; the other side is talking about speech FOR free.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Rob Rogers