Off course this will be largely ignored by the rightwingnuts because facts don’t matter to them. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html
No he wasn’t.
But Kelley never lets a trifling thing like reality get in his way.
All this and the republigoons, their sycophants/apply and their slaves/servants ignore what the very first American dictator wannabe,the fuhrer wannabe, herr Trump did to damage this country!
“If a Democrat is being investigated, she or he must be guilty or they would not be investigated. If a republican is proven guilty, it’s lying political attack.”
You guys are nuts.
YAWN!! SNOOZE!! ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
The facts are, of course, undeniably foreign to Skelley et al.
And they consume another heaping helping. At this rate we’re going to have a fertilizer shortage this spring.
Except that it isn’t true and no actual evidence has been presented.
SKelley can’t even tell you what “hacked” means.
Is this just another “Republican” loyalty test lie to attempt deflection from the presidential paper’s crime?
Kelly’s understanding of a court filing from Trump-appointed “special” counsel John Durham and his imaginary investigations into distracting away from Trump and his increasing number of felonies.
Trump was right, again.
Didn’t Hillary also start World War III?
Republicans are trying to advert attention to this? They are nuts!
No they were not. No hacking was done to Trump or white house computers. You are either a techno-idiot or deliberately lying.
Or maybe not. I’m going to believe what I want, ignore the rest.
Looks like S. Kelly loves wasting ink.
More willful stupidity! Kelly assumes Republicans don’t read. Well he is probably right about the Trumpist faction.
I love @MontanaBill’s reports from the UpsideDown!
MontatnaBill, clearly someone did something that was at the least unethical. It wasn’t Clinton and it wasn’t “hacking” trumps computers. Now can you admit that Jan 6th was an attempt at sedition, overthrowing a valid election? Let’s get things in perspective.
Too bad’ so sad.
Maybe Durham should investigate the 2020 election. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
If Durham had legitimate charges he would have made indictments.
Neither Durham nor the “Durham report” ever said such a thing. I wonder what would happen if he sued Kelley (and others) for libel. Unlike Palin with the New York Times, I suspect that deliberate malice could be proven.
How dare you say that Trump was right about anything.
‘Nother ’toon where somebody didn’t read the fine print. . .
Except that is not what Durham said. So once more into the breach of truth for you.
I wish there were some way to administer negative consequences to RWNJ influencers like Steve Kelley, who is either too incompetent to grasp what actually occurred in this instance (nothing communicated by the ‘toon literally took place) or deliberately misleads his credulous conservative audience as an act of cynical manipulation.
The first scenario admits a bit of leeway for mental incapacity, the second is simply insane to a degree — the degree of the insanity measured in proportion to negative societal/national/world outcomes Kelly and other RWNJ “influencers” succeed in creating.
Another example of the War on Truth. Coming to your local school boards any day now.
No news media (TV and Print) totally ignored it. Real journalism is dead!
Never mind what happen on Jan. 6th.
IF YOUR TIME IS SHORTA recent filing in one of two cases stemming from special counsel John Durham’s investigation spawned a flurry of false and misleading claims from pro-Trump pundits.
Durham has charged an attorney linked to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign with making a false statement to the FBI. The filing added new details about a 2017 meeting between the attorney and the CIA. It alleged that the attorney relayed concerns raised by another client, a technology executive, about internet traffic data from servers associated with the White House and Donald Trump’s business.
Durham’s filing never alleged what Watters falsely claimed: that Clinton paid hackers to spy on Donald Trump before and during his presidency, break into his computers, and then fraudulently frame him for colluding with Russia.
CONSPIRACY THEORIESYOU’LL NEVER BELIEVE IT BUT HILLARY CLINTON DID NOT, IN FACT, SPY ON TRUMP’S WHITE HOUSEIn less breaking news, Donald Trump remains a moron.
There are predictions that the case against Sussmann will be thrown out before it goes anywhere because of poor investigation on Durham’s part. It is much ado about nothing burgers.
It’s interesting how the reports attacking Hillary seem to show up at the most opportune moments. I’m no fan of hers, but it must be getting crowded in a RWNJ’s head. :-D
who knows what the truth is on this stuff…I think maybe we are being played by BOTH sides…..time for a couple of 3rd parties
Except that her campaign didn’t do that.
It’s coming boys & girls…