And yet, the Supreme Court had already ruled that protesting in front of abortion clinic workers’ homes is just fine and protected. Why the hypocrisy now?
Like fascists throughout history, they allow protestors only when they are protesting in their favor. The Democrat’s brownshirts will not receive any interference for doing the current regime’s bidding.
The chorus from the Repubs is “let the people decide”. But repeatedly polls have shown that people do not want Roe overturned. Repubs in Congress represent a minority of voters.
The parents at the school board meetings were THREATENING the school board members. Kavanaugh is “threatened” by a wine & cheese party (guess he’d prefer a kegger) and Susan Collins was “threatened” by chalk writing on the sidewalk that included the word PLEASE. SC needs to pay for wasting the time pf the police officers and the money to clean off the chalk.
18 U.S.C. § 1507. Federal statute bans picketing the residences of federal judges with the intent of influencing the judges’ decisions. Stop regarding yourself as an honest person if you advocate to the contrary. And please remove your masks while you’re assaulting the Justices so we can take good pictures and prosecute you after we remove Tyrant Slo Joe from office.
They are not illegally protesting at their homes. They are remaining on public property. And this is far more civil than what right wing extremists have done to the homes of judges and politicians they don’t like. Even low level politicians have had their homes vandalized by the radical right. Oh, and don’t forget the rash of right wing death threats against officials.
It was a tactical mistake by the protesters. They should have brought along a few kegs of beer. Kavanagh would have come out to join them in protesting. He likes beer!
So, it’s OK, to harass abortion providers at clinics, their churches, and homes, but write a polite message imploring your Senator to codify Roe vs Wade into law, or have a wine and cheese protest of your neighbor Supreme Court judge ‘I like beer’ not OK? Talk about abuse of power.
I believe that protesting in front of an officials place of place of business or other public place is a right — regardless of whether I like or abhor what is being protested. Protesting in front of an elected official’s home is wrong regardless of whether I like or abhor what is being protested or support to despise the official being protested. It is wrong when Republicans do it, it is wrong when Democrats do it. It is wrong if I agree with the protest, it is wrong if I disagree with the protest. What is NOT ok is only complaining about it if it is for an official/party/issue I don’t approve of and being silent and ok if done for one I do.
SKelley, do you know what they are protesting about?
Are you proud of yourself for expending all your effort toward right wing propaganda?
.
You are outraged, OUTRAGED!!!!!!!!!!! about The Leak!
And outraged, OUTRAGED!!!!!!!!!! about The Protests!
.
But what was it that was leaked???
What is the subject of the protest??
.
Once again, you exhibit the cowardice of the Trump Disciple and are willing only to follow the Trump Party instructions. Don’t you EVER claim to be independent in any of your thoughts or cartoons.
Daeder about 1 year ago
Someone teach Steve Kelley how to use a dictionary so he can look up the word “illegal”.
Concretionist about 1 year ago
Oy vey.
AndrewSharpe about 1 year ago
And yet, the Supreme Court had already ruled that protesting in front of abortion clinic workers’ homes is just fine and protected. Why the hypocrisy now?
Patjade Premium Member about 1 year ago
Another #JustPayneStupid submission.
feverjr about 1 year ago
Well, it is “National Blame Someone Else Day”…
Warcat about 1 year ago
Like fascists throughout history, they allow protestors only when they are protesting in their favor. The Democrat’s brownshirts will not receive any interference for doing the current regime’s bidding.
Nantucket Premium Member about 1 year ago
The chorus from the Repubs is “let the people decide”. But repeatedly polls have shown that people do not want Roe overturned. Repubs in Congress represent a minority of voters.
The parents at the school board meetings were THREATENING the school board members. Kavanaugh is “threatened” by a wine & cheese party (guess he’d prefer a kegger) and Susan Collins was “threatened” by chalk writing on the sidewalk that included the word PLEASE. SC needs to pay for wasting the time pf the police officers and the money to clean off the chalk.
1StrongBlackWoman Premium Member about 1 year ago
Absolutely worse than the Jan. 6 protest! Jail them without bail.
Odon Premium Member about 1 year ago
^^ Wow, the refusal to open ones eyes has become classic shinola.
William Bednar Premium Member about 1 year ago
I’ll have to admit that Merrick Garland has been a disappointment. President Lincoln would say: “He has the slows”. Garland acts more GOP than DEM.
s49nav about 1 year ago
18 U.S.C. § 1507. Federal statute bans picketing the residences of federal judges with the intent of influencing the judges’ decisions. Stop regarding yourself as an honest person if you advocate to the contrary. And please remove your masks while you’re assaulting the Justices so we can take good pictures and prosecute you after we remove Tyrant Slo Joe from office.
cdward about 1 year ago
They are not illegally protesting at their homes. They are remaining on public property. And this is far more civil than what right wing extremists have done to the homes of judges and politicians they don’t like. Even low level politicians have had their homes vandalized by the radical right. Oh, and don’t forget the rash of right wing death threats against officials.
walfishj about 1 year ago
Kelley: What makes it illegal, besides your imagination?
kelloggs2066 about 1 year ago
Garland should be impeached. He’s deliberately ignoring federal laws that make protesting on judges property a felony.
Dems love Felons.
Ivan the Terrible about 1 year ago
It’s a federal crime for anyone to harass a Federal judge. Look it up.
MuddyUSA Premium Member about 1 year ago
And Garland might have been a Supreme Court Justice?
bluegrassfan about 1 year ago
The standard of the liberal/progressive idiots to cause change through intimidation, not conversation.
MartinPerry1 about 1 year ago
It was a tactical mistake by the protesters. They should have brought along a few kegs of beer. Kavanagh would have come out to join them in protesting. He likes beer!
Rich Douglas about 1 year ago
Are they protesting illegally?
GiantShetlandPony about 1 year ago
So, it’s OK, to harass abortion providers at clinics, their churches, and homes, but write a polite message imploring your Senator to codify Roe vs Wade into law, or have a wine and cheese protest of your neighbor Supreme Court judge ‘I like beer’ not OK? Talk about abuse of power.
KarenLaRae Premium Member about 1 year ago
I believe that protesting in front of an officials place of place of business or other public place is a right — regardless of whether I like or abhor what is being protested. Protesting in front of an elected official’s home is wrong regardless of whether I like or abhor what is being protested or support to despise the official being protested. It is wrong when Republicans do it, it is wrong when Democrats do it. It is wrong if I agree with the protest, it is wrong if I disagree with the protest. What is NOT ok is only complaining about it if it is for an official/party/issue I don’t approve of and being silent and ok if done for one I do.
braindead Premium Member about 1 year ago
SKelley, do you know what they are protesting about?
Are you proud of yourself for expending all your effort toward right wing propaganda?
.
You are outraged, OUTRAGED!!!!!!!!!!! about The Leak!
And outraged, OUTRAGED!!!!!!!!!! about The Protests!
.
But what was it that was leaked???
What is the subject of the protest??
.
Once again, you exhibit the cowardice of the Trump Disciple and are willing only to follow the Trump Party instructions. Don’t you EVER claim to be independent in any of your thoughts or cartoons.